>Tilføjede mere til artiklen cirka 50 min efter, at jeg udgav den, som man kan læse i bunden af artiklen<
Dette spørgsmål om at man burde søge en fritagelse fra Coronapas, har jeg set på Facebook et par gange nu. Det går mig lidt på, at folk tror de behøver at få et bevis for at de er fritaget for at deltage i et verdensomspændende medicinsk forsøg. Jeg vil jo mene, at vi er født frie mennesker, og vi skal ikke have lov til at blive undtaget fra noget som burde være et frit valg.
Måden de udfører dette forsøg på, er intet mindre en forkasteligt. Du får fortalt, at du skal fejle noget for at kunne slippe for, at blive presset til, at tage en vaccine. Hvad er det for en tankegang. Jeg forstår simpelhen ikke ideologien i det.
Når det så er sagt, burde det slet ikke være nødvendigt at skulle have sådan en fritagelse, hvis man nu gerne vil spille med på deres leg. For i 1947 blevet der lavet en lov, som gælder i hele verden. Den kan ikke omgås, den kan ikke fjernes, den kan simpelhen ikke ignores. Den burde hænge på busstationerne i stedet for de reklamer for Big Phama, hvilket i øvrigt også er ulovligt. Man må ikke reklamere for vacciner. Det er et frit valg.
Loven der skal sætte os fri!
Men tilbage til den lov “The Nuremberg Code (1947)”, vi alle har nok hørt om den, men få forstår dens betydning.
Hvilket er, at du må på ingen måde, må føle dig presse til, at tage noget som helst. Du må ikke vejledes eller vildledes til, at tage noget som du ikke vil!
Læs den igennem og print en kopi ud. Den kopi kan du tage med dig rundt, hvis du føler dig utryg, ved at sige fra.
Jeg ved personligt og har følt hvor angstprovokerende det kan være at gå ind i en butik, hvor alle har masker på. Man er den eneste uden. Folk kigger og ser sure ud, eller det føler man.
Men lad dem bare, du er i din fulde ret til at sige nej. Man burde ikke se ned på dem der tør at sige fra. Man burde respektere dem, ligeså vel som omvendt.
Informer dine medborgere, hjælp dem i disse svære tider. Til at slutte af med så vil jeg citere Viktor Bodin fra Demofonbilen “SIG NEJ TAK TIL VACCINEN”
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. - The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
- The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
- The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
- No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
- Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
- The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
- During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
- During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Tilføjede kl 14:50
Lad os heller ikke glemme Grundloven
I vores egen Danske Grundlov har vi også en del, der beskytter os mod tvang. Når det så er sagt, så skal den skrives om, når alt det her er ovre. Den giver enevælde til Dronningen, hvilket i bund og grund betyder, at vi ikke har et demokrati, men et Kongestyre. Men det er en sag til en anden dag.
Grundloven:
Kapitel VIII
§ 71
Stk. 1.
Den personlige frihed er ukrænkelig. Ingen dansk borger kan på grund af sin politiske eller religiøse overbevisning eller sin afstamning underkastes nogen form for frihedsberøvelse.
Fritagelse for at deltage forudsætter deltagelse. Lige nøjagtig